Friday, June 16, 2006

SORRY NIECES AND NEPHEWS...

Things have been a little too interesting around Camp Kelso.

We must, however, insist upon kudos for our call of David Brooks on the Duke Lacrosse Crime. The piss-boy had to issue an apology to his readers for his slanted comments in favor of the rapists, and acknowledge that he (Brooks) had indeed accepted an assignment to teach a course at Duke in the fall, but that he still felt he had been impartial. And Kelso still insists upon getting Brooks when the lights go out. Think forcible sodomy is just fine, Brooks? Then get ready for -- to quote the Master -- "some intense serious ass-fucking", and you the caboose, baby.

Kelso invites all of you to visit anitasnewblog.typepad.com for a short video that captures exactly the vibe Kelso has been reaching for but failing to quite get vis-a-vis Ann Coulter.

Democrats continue to disappoint, casting Jefferson aside when his complaint against the DOJ is a slam-dunk winner with support all of the poltical spectrum. Anyway, you know Jefferson's clean because at the worst all he took is $90,000 and stuck in tin-foil in his freezer. By today's standards that's not even dishonest. It's grocery money for a bullshit favor.

Personality Quiz: Would you rather be Hugh Hefner or Doyle Brunson?

A final bit of New York City pride. Anybody who hates Manny Ramirez is not a New Yorker and Kelso does not give a crap if that person is a die-hard fan of Rudy Giuliani's Girls. Manny Ramirez is probably the finest major league ballplayer to come out of the NYC public school system and from Manhattan no less.

Kelsos Nuts love you.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

i don't think i want to be EITHER hugh hefner OR doyle brunson.

does that mean i don't have a personality?????

:(

KELSO'S NUTS said...

It comes down to would a person rather be expert in his or her craft or have an unlimited supply of sex partners.

How about Virginia Woolf or Carmen Electra?

anita said...

oh dear. that's a tough one to be sure. need it be an either / or proposition?

as i recall, virginia certainly had her share of sex partners particularly among the bloomsbury group, male and female in fact (remember her infamous affair with vita sackville-west?). was there an unlimited supply of them? i doubt it. i am sure the party- and good-old-boy types found her, at minimum, tolerably morose, at worse, darkly depressing and to be avoided at all costs.

so, i guess i've talked myself into my choice: virginia woolf. hands down. even though she offed herself in the end.

anita said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.