Tuesday, May 01, 2007

DUDES AND DWEEBS, BUT FIRST WOULD SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN...

...to Kelso the whole Barrack Obama "thing"? And please no racial stuff, please. There's nothing so special about his candidacy with regard to his "race." Those with long memories will recall Barbara Jordan. And Jesse Jackson in 1988, yes or no? Was Kelso on Mars in August of 2004 or did Al Sharpton not demolish Obama at the lectern? Sharpton was very funny in his skewering of the absurdities of the campaign and very serious in his commitment to peace and social justice, while Obama spoke in some language that kind of seemed like English, but didn't really make any sense to anyone who speaks English. Subject, predicate, object? Sure. But what did he say exactly? "We worship an awesome God in the Blue States..." Huh? What the fuck does that mean? Kelso lived in a Blue State at the time and doesn't recall worshipping any God, awesome or otherwise. So, who's "we," White Man? Senator Obama, you were certainly speaking of you and the mouse in your pocket, right? Gee whiz, that awesome God stuff was the part of the speech that made most sense in English. The rest of it had the feeling of something Lt. Commander Data of Star Trek: The Next Generation might have said albeit without the irony.

And the glowing praise that followed that strange speech in quasi-English-quasi-Liturgical-Politico idiom was beyond racist. It was Dr. Johnson's (was it G.K Chesterton) remark about "a woman preaching..." You all remember -- it's not so much that she can do it well but that she can do it all that makes it remarkable. Weren't any of you listening to Al Sharpton? He did it pretty well. This patronising PC-though-racist applause of Obama was echoed recently by Joe Biden. Go google or YouTube it. Kelso has more important stuff to say to rehash Biden's stupidity.

Let's put the racial shit to rest once and for all. Barrack Obama is not your first African-American President of The United States of America. Christ, Obama ought not have been your second African-American Illinois United States Senator. Your first African-American President of the United States of America is the fellow Obama, Richards Daley and Durbin, and surely Rahm Emmanuel jobbed out of that seat: U.S. Representative Jesse Jackson, Jr. Jackson is brighter than Obama, at least as well-educated and has a far, far more patrician bearing than Obama does, AND never, ever speaks in strings of cliches. So, no, there's nothing about Obama's race that bugs Kelso. It's the person Barrack Obama himself what gives Kelso hives.

Is it the speech? Is it the ass-fucking of Jesse Jackson, Jr.? Is it Obama's wretched ghost-written book offering nothing but Democratic concession to Republicans on all issues combined with more Tapioca Pudding English? Is it Obama's vote in support of Bush's "Bankruptcy Reform" measure which is about to shoot 10cc of leche into many, many homeowners mouths? Is it his ducking the Terry Schiavo vote? Is it showing up of Tom Harkin at Harkin's event? Is it Obama's Fundamentalist Christianity? [That didn't work so great for Harold Ford, Jr., did it?] Is it his wishy-washiness on every single issue of import? Where does he stand on the Wars? Where does he stand on abortion? On criminal justice? Or health care? Or fucking anything? Kelso doesn't have the faintest idea but suspects it somewhat to the right of the middle of the Democratic party. We already have one Democrat who needs to be on all four sides of every issues and she's the likely winner. We'll settle for that. At least we know she's a hawk with a very weak commitment to civil rights and civil liberties but likely a stronger one than Obama's. And Obama's the one Democrat who could fuck up a pure-nuts situation, an un-loseable election. While Hillary Clinton, John Edwards and certainly Al Gore would bury any Republican opponent, Obama might not get one electoral vote. We need that like we need a PCB milkshake. And borrow from an old Village Voice article about Geradine Ferraro, an Obama candidacy would assure that there would sooner be an African-American on Pluto than on a Democratic ticket for a long while. Unless Jesse, Jr., makes his move, of course, and that won't be for a while.

So, please explain Obama to Kelso over whose head this whole phenomenon is sailing. Kelso's seeing a son of a bitch, but Kelso's been wrong a lot.

DUDE

Tillman family. Full stop. My Lai v2007.

DWEEB

George Tenet. Too little too late. Put the fucking freedom medal on ebay.

If the Obama stuff isn't grabbing anybody, how about a gambling question regarding this ghastly version of Omaha they play down here: 25-50 No Limit with cap? Is a full-wrap of middle height better than a Big Pair plus a Small Pair with one flush draw? And is one supposed to get all the chips in before the flop with either?

Kelso's Nuts love you.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well Kelso none of them are perfect and we in the left/green/dem categories have been forced into the thinking of "electability". We can privately concur with Sharpton or Nader or Cobb or Kucinich and maybe even tout their virtues around the block a bit. But nobody wants to put their chips on somebody they THINK has little chance of winning. Its all abut the center. The right wont change, the left wont change. They fight over the people in between. The uncommitted.

Why should anyone work to get the left's approval? They know that Gingrich or Hunter won't woo them away! Thats what its all about, sweets. Taking the base for granted as a given.

We saw this with Kerry getting the nomination even though he didnt say much in English either. He was Republican Lite. We saw Kerry get dragged around and "swiftboated" while he stood there STILL saying little. He had no passion, and no connection.

But he was perceived as safe, the only way to get back the White House. Which didn't work.

So perhaps intellectually people like the other candidates but people are more concerned about who can win, not who will be a good President. The elected dont care about the job, and the electors dont care either.

With Obama, we see an articulate REALIST who is as left as we think we can get. Thats the Obama attraction, I think. Is he a typical seelout behind closed doors? Yeah. But my man Kucinich will never win, there's futility in that effort for many of us. IN an ideal world things would be so different!

Glad to reconnect with you, Kelso. I still dont follow gambling references though.

The only gambling I ever did in my life was a scratch off lotto ticket I got as a gift. Oh, and Bingo with senior citizens!

KELSO'S NUTS said...

Lily:

A brilliant effort by a past-master blogger but I'm sorry to say: STILL, NO SALE.

Going point by point, yes I agree with you about the protest candidates. In rank order, I like Kucinich, Paul, Grevel & Cobb. I like Edwards best among the top tier, though I'd be very happy with Gore. I had only litmus test on Gore in 2000; had he picked Bayh, Edwards or Kerry as his VP choice, I'd have been fine with him. He failed me miserably picking Lieberman and using Leon Fuerth (a PNAC guy) as foreign policy advisor. I was stuck with Nader. Voted for Kucinich in NYS primary in '04 and Kerry (reluctantly) in general election. I'm not convinced that Kerry wasn't the winner but like Gore in 2000 Kerry showed himself to be much worse than Republican Lite. He showed down as a REPULICAN who didn't mind losing at all.

I'm not against the idea of having a centrist Democrat as President, although I have to strongly disagree with you that Obama is the most LEFT of those considered electable. There is only one candidate ex-Gore who looks like a sure winner and that's Hillary Clinton, whom I don't particularly like but for whom I will vote happily and donate money.

This "articulate" business bugs me a little and I go back to Samuel Johnson (or was Chesterton, I just don't remember and am too lazy to google). Of the field, the most articulate is Clinton, followed by Edwards, Grevel, and Dodd. Obama is not all that articulate and he certainly doesn't strike me as a realist. Hillary, most definitely, and other than her electability, she has that iron chin and is a very, very careful campaigner not prone to any gaffes. She's not about to take the kind of abuse Gore and Kerry did. Obama's chin hasn't been tested yet but it will be very soon and somehow I think it will be so awful that he'll fall. Look at his weak response to all the madrassa shit -- to cave in and claim to be the holiest Bapitist on the planet. He'll hit the canvas hard with the first real attack.

I really don't see Obama as particulary progressive. He strikes me as something of a conservative, though certainly not reactionary or regressive. On the ideological scale I'd say Left to Right I'd make it Kucinich, Grevel, Edwards, Gore if he goes, Clark, Richardson, Dodd, Clinton, Obama and Biden.

Like you I'm no longer willing to make the protest vote. Ex-Kucinich, Grevel, Edwards, Gore-If, and Clark, I really see Clinton as the least right wing of a very consvative group. I'd put Obama about where Biden is. Which is to say that Obama and Biden would fit comfotably in the Center-Right of the British Conservative party.

And if most men knew what I know about her, she would pass easiest of all the Whom-Would-You-Rather-Have-A-Beer-With heuristic. Look, she and the Big Dog were partying in Hot Springs with beserkers like Dan Lasater and Dave Vance. Obama made a big to do about his have done yeyo, yeah? I assure you Hillary has spilled more than Obama's snorted. And that's to her credit! Don't forget that she creamed McCain in a vodka shots contest in Estonia.

In an ideal world, Kucinich would be electable and Hillary would be more forthright but in ideal world what would Obama be? Stokeley Charmichael v1966? It's not imaginable that he'd even be liberal let alone radical. He was just fine in the Illinois State Senate voting on DuPage County zoning variances. In retrospect, Obama and Alan Keyes had more in common than in opposition in the Illinois Senate race.

To sell me Obama, you have to show me he's to Hillary Clinton's left and I don't think you can do it. How many times to you need to be shown that Obama's not left of center but could well be right of center.

I'll stick with Hillary, thanks, because at least I know I have a great chance with. If Gore comes in, he wins easy and will have my support. The nominee other than Gore will have to be a Hawk, a Death Penalty proponent, very flexible on choice, grandiose as to personal religious practice and extremely strict as to criminal justice. So, if I'm stuck with that, give me the winner. I don't see Obama winning and not because he's black but because he hasn't done anything.

To sell me on hi