PEN AND PETA AND ACRYMONIOUS ACRONYMS FOR $1000, ALEX
This post was inspired by a gentle flame Kelso got on his last post, taking him to task for going to the cockfights at La Gallera San Miguelito last Saturday. As a preamble, we're going to have to take a trip in the wayback machine to 1987.
The issue was PEN's choice of George P. Shultz (who held different cabinet positions during Reagan's presidency) to give the keynote address at their convention. As Kelso recalls the story, the choice was either made by then president, Norman Mailer, by fiat or perhaps Mailer cast the deciding vote in favor of Shultz over Grace Paley's objections. Kelso has much admiration for both authors and found merit in both sides of the argument. Ultimately, though Kelso was a pup with no stake in the outcome whatsoever, he agreed with Mailer's choice. The family Kelso was split 2-2 with Kelso and Kelso-mere in agrement, Kelso-pere and Kelso-seure against. Former Mrs. Kelso #1 cast the deciding vote in agreement with Mailer on Shultz.
It really came down to this. Wasn't a Reagan cabinet official and former Bechtel Corporation officer exactly the wrong person for PEN to honor for a million reasons? Or was it an iconclastic choice of someone instrumental in reining in Reagan, Bush Sr, Casey, & Meese's worst instincts? The only outspoken Republican at that high level completely out-of-the-closet opposing both the death penalty and in favor of legalization of drugs had been a lone voice in Reagan's cabinet opposing asset-forfeiture laws and Federal Mandatory No-Parole Sentencing Guidelines? He was also a well-spoken guy with good stories to tell and had been instrumental in getting the USA and the USSR down to the table. Rushdie could wait. Atwood could wait. There was always next year for them. And the whole thing passed by without too much rancor.
Wow. All kinds of serious left-wingers can have different viewpoints on serious issues. Go figure. Does that mean that Kelso doesn't have to think that Zora Neale Hurston was a better writer than Virginia Woolf was? You sure now? OK. Not that's there's anything wrong with Zora Neale Hurston...
These are Old-School names. Rushdie is the only one still in common currency. But Kelso issues a challenge. Find two big-time artists of today whose politics are more progressive than either Mailer or Paley's were. Bono? Sinead O' Connor? Jonathan Franzen? You must be joking. Mailer was also a boxing fanatic. And Kelso's not sure but he can't recall "anti-cockfighting" to be high up on Paley's list of important issues. She probably would have said she liked Gabriel Garcia Marquez's novella No One Writes To The Colonel. As a feminist thinker, however, there aren't too many who could run with Paley. Not Toni Morrison to be sure.
What does this have to do with anything and why are you being boring again, Kelso? Nobody cares about George Shultz or Norman Mailer or Grace Paley or Gabriel Garcia Marquez. We've never heard of them. We like Sean Penn and Leonardo DiCaprio.
Kelso digs. That's great. They are good actors and each has a social conscience. But for fuck's sake, you think either of those guys give a rat's ass what PETA has to say about cockfighting? NeverfuckingmindNormanMailerorGracePaley.
This is all just more of the same old, same old "identity politics" thing that has made a hash of everything. Yes, the same kind of shit that makes very few willing to tell the truth about Obama today and about Lieberman in 2000. Democrats, Progressives, Left Wingers -- why does everyone have to be on the same team on every interest-group's views? As a Jewish man, Kelso felt no pride, only revulsion, at the thought of a Vice President Joe Lieberman. That Vice-President Cheney is worse proves the point. Plenty of well-meaning progressives were all-out for Gore, even though he ran to Bush's right in the fall campaign. Kelso didn't like the okey-doke but he understood what fellow progressives were thinking. Gore was the least worst. They were certainly right about that. But given the Gore/Lieberman Likudnik bellicosity during that campaign, could anyone make a case that those two were somehow not possessed of a villain's sang-froid?
Kelso believes that the state of Israel has the right to exist in any form it chooses but cannot advocate the Ohmert/Netanyahu/AIPAC point of view on any Middle-Eastern issue. He just is not that cold-blooded. But let Kelso admit to enjoying a cockfight...whoa, now you've gone too far. Wretched Palestinians are one thing, but come on, how could your heart not bleed for the poor roosters? Long prison terms in privatized prisons for small amounts of drugs is bad, but betting on a cockfight is a sin! The occupation of Iraq is like bad, but professional boxing is worse. It's sooooo violent. That's it, Kelso, you're outta here. Go over to the Romney campaign where you belong, you fascist!
If that's the consensus, does Kelso have a choice? He's ready to bite down hard and vote for someone far more cold-blooded than he is, Senator Clinton. There's no doubt in Kelso's mind that Clinton is another one who's an absolutist on no cockfighting but would never waver off her belief in the death penalty for human beings even if "we" make a mistake sometimes. Ditto Obama. Ditto Edwards.
May we please be adults here. If there's one thing to say about Pat Tillman --left of all of us politically -- that hasn't already been said, it's this: one may hold unorthodox views on subjects that certain organized identity groups disapprove of and still be consistent in one's belief in peace, social justice, workers' rights, a right to food, water, clothing, shelter, education, health, sex (inclusive of abortion and contraception), pay equity and on and on and on...
But if enjoying a night at the birds is the deal breaker, then count Kelso out -- he'll take Bloomberg or Romney or just give up the franchise. If that's the deal, though, you had better be ready to read the labels on the clothes you buy, as well as the electronics and food, because what's going on where most of that shit comes from makes an evening at the birds seem pretty close to an evening watching tivo-ed Ellens or whatever the fuck the show is called. Screw that. Ellen has been fairly daring in her life. It's like watching Barney. No? Do some research on the Marianas Islands. Or China.
We'll "do" Karl Rove in the next post. And -- advance warning -- Kelso may well say one or two positive things about the man.
Kelso's Nuts love you, but Kelso's not going away. He's just going to get more radical and crazier.
Monday, August 13, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
I must admit that I was tempted to bring it up, but happy to see you back. Plus, I just wasn't sure I wanted to get into it and am now sure that I do not want to get into with you.
However, I will ask you what it is that you enjoy about it. I ask because I just don't understand the allure of something like this.
Choose to answer or not as you wish dear Kelso. As we are all giant balls of contradictions as humans, I simply pose the question with no judgment. Cockfighting exists whether or not Kelso is there. I may not like that but it is true.
Also - regarding Israel/etc, check out www.ygurvitz.wordpress.com
Not much for commenting on but good reading. Got it from Blue Gal.
Judeo-Christian "Valuations"
"Differential Asset Valuation in the Medieval Post-Talmudic Legal Literature"
History of Political Economy, Forthcoming
Contact: JEFFREY L. CALLEN
University of Toronto - Joseph L. Rotman School of
Management
Email: callen@rotman.utoronto.ca
Auth-Page: http://ssrn.com/author=17573
Abstract: http://ssrn.com/abstract=926790
ABSTRACT: This study evaluates the extent to which the asset valuation arguments raised by medieval post-Talmudic legal scholars are consistent with modern contingent claims analysis. In particular, this study evaluates the arguments proposed by these scholars in order to rationalize the Talmud's differential valuation of the same asset by multiple claimants. Modern
contingent claims analysis is able to explain differential valuation by invoking market imperfections such as transactions costs and asymmetric information. We conjecture that market imperfections lie behind the Talmud's differential valuation of the Kethubah. This study finds that although some post-Talmudic
scholars -- notably Rashi, the Rashbam and the Rosh -- can be interpreted as raising transactions costs and asymmetric information arguments to rationalize differential valuation of the Kethubah, their lines of reasoning are typically included as
part of a broader set of less convincing rguments. We argue that this mixture of deep insights into asset valuation and abstruse logic is likely a continuation of Talmudic ambivalence to the
valuation of non-human capital, an ambivalence induced by the biblical prohibition against interest.
I remember someone told me once about this beautiful Gentile girl he was dating, or maybe I read it in a novel, "she's the kind who loves animals and hates men."
H: was that robbed by Oliver Stone or was did it follow on WALL STREET? Michael Douglas same line to Charlie Sheen, mas o menos.
FRAN:
I like sports; I like betting. I like learning new things about sports and betting. I won't get into the specifics of cock-fighting but there are many interesting elements in both the sporting and gambling sides.
As I've said before, I've gone native in some strange way and I take pride in the fact that I can go to a ghetto Gallera and have the right look, the right clothes, the right attidute, the ability to speak Panamanian slang, so that I can do my business fearlessly despite having the lightest complexion in the place.
Just read THE COCKFIGHTER by CHARLES WILLEFORD and see the movie version on DVD, starring Warren Oates. Then make up your mind.
I could really snowball everyone here by saying taking Harvey's comment and dragging it out a little further. You get the idea: if PETA staged a protest outside San Miguelito, they'd get robbed, beaten-up or worse,yet Kelso would be the progessive still standing, who'd be there to carry Kucinich's flag. And the well-meaning PETA folks would be calling the cops or the embassy but to no avail. Kelso would have already treated the cops ALREADY INSIDE to BBQ and cold beers.
And this is the point of the post -- Harvey gets it because he's a landsmann and a NYer -- but being OLD SCHOOL and being left-wing are not mutually-exclusive.
H--
will examine abstract and have comment on it on FOREGO'S NUTS.
Hey baby, be who you are. I do not judge.
Unless you are George Bush!
I am not George Bush though I wish I had as much money as he has.
Post a Comment