As everyone who reads the Nuts, there have been few politicans who have scalded said Nuts to the degree that Barack Obama had. It's all in the archives. I don't want to rehash old business. I'm not backing off from my view that he's run a weak-centrist, surrendering campaign, that he's too religious and sanctimonious for my tastes, that his combination of ego and brittle personality me caen mal, his appeal to the Right, his Fundamentalist Christianity and his weakness on the issues and the "cult" all bug me. It all seemed to fly in the face of his exceptional intelligence.
And I still feel all those things. But the speech changed how I look at the man. It was the first political speech I've ever heard listening to which I thout every step of the way that if I could write a fantasy speech for Obama to deliver, I could not have done a better job. Instead of the pablum intoned, Obama spoke to the nation as a peer. He touched on race but more importantly on tribalism and social class. His elegant defense of Revered Wright showed some fucking combination of brains and balls. Truly, not a day has gone by since in which I haven't pondered some element of it. I guess everybody here's as tired of my praise of Obama as they were of my attacks on him. So, I'll get to the point.
How does a speech that causes me, formerly a hard-core Obama opponent, to view the candidate in a newly positive light and to view the speech as an American political touchstone, to shift my thinking on Obama, while his popularity with press and people sinks like a stone? I've heard a lot of possible explanations: "as long as race is an issue it hurts Obama," "he didn't go far enough in denouncing Reverend Wright," "he insulted his grand-mother in a race-based way," "the speech was too intelletual," "it was his 'Romney Moment,'" and of course "it was just words." I don't believe any of that. So, how did one of the politicans I least admired became one of the very few I do admire?
My task in the betting markets is too watch all the CNN coverage. My partner pulls a hideous double-duty; he has to listen to RUSH and FOX all the time. Yet, there's no shortage of Obama coveage on CNN.
Then, a few weird things started happening. Mainly, Obama's approval ratings went into the dumper just as my view of him went up. That was just weird. Until, I noticed that CNN kept cutting away from political issues to more and more pictures of dis-affected Black children being thrown into squad cars as the polices earched for more participants in the murders of a couple of White college girls. That was no coincidence. I'm sorry. The juxtapositioning was too precise. The unspoken message was Barack Obama=Superpredator.
You all remember "superpredators," don't you? The maximum evil predicted to terrorize all of America by Bill Bennett, John DiUlio (Bush Faith-Based Initiative Guy) and John Walters (All-Purpose Republican Anti-Drug Guy). Those "superpredators" never did come to gitch, did they? Violent crime began to sink like a stone in the early 1990s, as the USA moved out of a recession into a long boom period.
So, in the days following Obama's speech, while Fox was playing the endless tape-loop of Reverend Wright's greatest hits (still none of which sounded terribly unreasonable to me), and CNN kept interspersing Obama speech clips, with Spitzer/Paterson stuff, with heaping helpings of still shots of the White Southern Sorority Girls (tm) who were allegedly murdered by a seemingly endless parade of young black men with tattoos and all the trimmings into the backs of squad cars.
Could the fucking media and public failure of one of the finest speeches in the nation's history and its contemporaneous fall in the national polling of Barack Obama have anything to do with the subliminal and well-overt FOX and CNN "black president? No Way" strategy? No. How could I possibly think that. I'm just wearing a tin-foil hat ("Gorra De Lata") and dreaming up American conspiracy theories.
I originally wanted Kucinich, then I switched to Clinton having become increasingly impressed with her debate performances and increasingly frustrated by Obama's lack of specificity and his closeness with the religious right and support of UIGEA. After Obama showed me this new look, this tremendous historical sophistication and big brass balls, I kind of lean his way. And I certainly don't want Clinton to win this way, riding FOX and CNN racism. McCain we know is a Nazi.
So, I had been tinkering with the idea of casting my last vote as a citizen for Cynthia McKinney on the Green Party line. Now, I find out that foreign resident aliens abroad have no electors. I have been disenfranchised. Best I can do is hope that Obama continues along the path of strength, sophistication, and respect and beats McCain. And maybe that McKinney gets 5% and qualifies for public financing for the Green Party.
So, I have indeed cast my last vote as a US citizen. It was the Libertarian line candidates against Clinton for Senator and against Spitzer for Governor. For Andrew Cuomo for NYS Attorney General. For Jerrold Nadler for U.S. Congress. For all of the judges on the Democratic line. That's it. My first US votes were for Ted Kennedy in the 1980 Democratic Primary. For Jimmy Carter for President in the general election and the rest of the Democratic line. It's been a blast. A circus for the people. But a blast nonetheless.
Kelso's Nuts love you
Monday, March 24, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
interesting -- you are allowed to vote if you live overseas -- but since you have no electors -- it doesnt count.
makes perfect sense in the world of soviet style American elections.
now Bayh wants the super delegates to vote the way the electoral votes have panned out in the primaries. clinton's 14 states have 212, obama's 27 states have 209 --- simple vote for Clinton she has more electoral votes.
i think the desperation is more than enough to turn me off to her, regardless of her policies. plush she (well Penn and Wolfson) may have run the worst campaign in history, even worse than Kennedy in 1980 or GHWB in 1992.
The end of an era - I raise my glass and tip my sombrero to you, citizen!
Can we expect this new lack of encumbrance to be a sign that we'll now get the full Kelso monty (haha)?
D-CAPny: I think you may have missed the point. I cannot vote in a US election unless I am a resident of a state or a territory. I am neither. I am a resident alien of a foreign nation, albeit still a citizen. The Democratic Party allowed all of us in this situation to vote in a special primary but the Democratic National Committee is an entity without executive or legislative power. This was merely a one-off decision by Howard Dean and the executive board. Gillespie and the Republican Party may have done the same, but I don't think so. Thus, I have no voting rights, nor any rights as a US citizen, although I am expected to pay US taxes. Really, all I do have is the full rights and privileges of "resident investor" in the Republic of Panama, which means that I can't vote here either but I have full protection of the Republic and the tax issue is moot because I am not liable for foreign-source income and there is no extradition treaty with the USA and my personhood is private by Panamanian law meaning that the local authorities have no right to monitor me and the US may not have any of my legal nor banking records. That is the state of play
O-TIM: I have to renew my status as a "resident investor" once more and see that time period to its conclusion before I can change citizenship. My son will automatically be granted the right of dual or Panamanian citizenship at that point.
I am as encumbered still as I was two weeks ago. But one pays attorneys for these sorts of things.
I kind of LIKE not having the right to vote in the presidential election because it's a circus for the people and nothing more.
I've already met most of the leading pols here and have been to a number of social functions. I have a far greater say in politics doing it this way than by participating in November's Super Bowl. Arizona Cardinals versus Chicago Bears. Wow. What a great game!
I doubt I could possibly have shown more than the full Monty even before this.
Oh, D-CAPny: I disagree with you about how Clinton's campaign has been run. She's run the same campaigns she run in NY. She just ran into a better opponent than either Lazio or Spencer. If "the rules" apply in Obama's favor vis-a-vis FL & MI, then "the rules" apply with regard to how the super-delegates or all delegates for that matter choose to vote even if that works for Clinton.
I like Clinton slightly more on the issues. I was impressed by Obama's last big speech to the point that I am now indifferent really between them and prefer either to McCain. But make no mistake about what you'd be getting with either Clinton or Obama. A slightly mellower Joe Lieberman is all.
On the issues that really matter to you, ask yourself: "Do I like Clinton or Obama?" And if the economy or the wars are the main issues, I promise you this: none of the three will be ending any war anytime soon.
Not my problem. Not my fight.
hooray, your writings on theater and writing much missed!
Post a Comment