Kelso is listening to Johnny Cash's "Sunday Morning Coming Down" and "Folsom Prison Blues" to get in the mood for this promised grim one.
First some useful links:
http://hcs.harvard.edu/~amnesty/articles/prisonslavery.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/20/politics/20rape.html
The first is an Harvard Branch Of Amnesty International reprint of Adam Liptak's New York Times piece of last fall on the Roderick Johnson case. Astute readers will notice that Kelso used the proper name of the Tissue Of Lies here. That's because Adam Liptak is nobody's puppet -- just a top-flight investigative reporter and a very good writer to boot.
The second link is the piece from yesterday's Tissue Of Lies, the link that moved Kelso to take up this subject.
Now, for a little litmus test. Here are punch lines to two jokes.
Joke 1: "...and so the prison guard says to the fish, 'meet your cellmate, Big Leroy.'" How many of you are laughing? Kelso puts the number at around 25%.
Joke 2: "...and so the doctor says to his patient, 'you have inoperable pancreatic cancer.'" How many of you are laughing AT THE SAME GODDAMNED JOKE? None, Kelso reckons.
Now think about cancer every time you want to laugh at a prison rape joke. Kelso understands that humor is in the eye of the beholder, and this is a PC-free zone, so if you think cancer is funny, Kelso thinks you should also laugh your ass off -- n.p.i. -- about prison rape.
Most Republicans love the idea of prison rape because they like to seem tough and love the idea of the suffering of the poor and unfortunate. Most Democrats don't give a shit one way or another, but like the idea of seeming tough on crime. And now that the Republicans have gotten their triple winner of a huge prison population that is not only privatized but also placed strategically in districts that allow extra GOP house seats, the bottom has really dropped out of the barrel, no?
Kelso alluded to the issue of prison rape some weeks back, when he went into the Way-Back Machine to highlight Ted Koppel's sudden questioning the idea that sexual bondage should be part of the offcial sanction. Why was Koppel so interested in THAT settled subject then? Why because it was 1993 and Wind, Koon, Powell and Briseno had just been sentenced to time for the Rodney King beating. That's why. Koppel was worried what might befall the noble LA policemen in prison. Koppel so worried about it that he actually asked the rhetorical question: "Is 5 years of sexual slavery the right punishment for a car thief?" Kelso noted that was big of Mr. Big Hair. Thanks.
Now, Floppers, why is the prison rape panel and the author of the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 1993, U.S. Rep. Barbara Lee (you know, the black, Bay Area Democrat who voted against the wars!)all of a sudden newsworthy? Newsworthy enough to make the National Report page of the Tissue Of Lies?
Let's connect the dots. What happened in the past week that sits at the nexus of all three branches of government? The indictment of Jack Abramoff, a fellow who knows where all the bodies are buried. What's about to happen in October? U.S. Attorney Fitzgerald's term will expire. Fitzgerald just happens to be the lead investigator into the Valerie Plame affair. Count on no re-appointment from Bush. So do count on all indictments coming down before his term expires. With the Senate out of session, Senator Pat Roberts' (R-KA) plan to hold a Senate investigation giving all principals immunity will not happen before Fitzgerald's time runs out. Rove and Libby may get it. Possibly McLellan. Maybe even President Cheney and the Flying Monkey. Tom DeLay may get it if Abramoff spills on the Indian Tribe extortion, the Marianas Islands child sex-slave issue, and god knows what else? And if the big kids manage to duck it, there will be a few lower-downs forced by the Bush Crime Family to take it for the team.
And that, Floppers, is why prison-rape, and not Barbara Lee's "lack of patriotism" is all of a sudden an issue of concern for the Tissue Of Lies. And why the BUSH appointed panel is meeting. Please note the total bullshit answers by prison officials that they "don't know the scale of the problem" and their prescription that it needs more study. You bastards.
Kelso reiterates: he thinks these people are filthy, greedy monsters with blood on their hands, but he would take no joy in any of them being raped in prison. Kelso does not believe rape should be part of the official sanction and is hoping that Roderick Johnson -- told by the warden "fight or fuck, son" -- wins his case, unlikely though that result is.
Kelso understands that he's been WAY too earnest this morning, so let's have a little safe fun with it all. Here's Kelso's odds on the various random variables in this situation:
JACK ABRAMOFF GOES TO PRISON: Yes -$9.50/No +$7.50
TOM DeLAY GOES TO PRISON: No -$7.00/Yes +$6.50
U.S. ATTY FITZGERALD HANDS DOWN INDICTMENTS BEFORE OCTOBER: Yes -$6.00/No +$5.00
PAT ROBERTS CAN STOP FITZGERALD WITH A SENATE INQUIRY: No -$2.50/Yes +$2.25
LIBBY IN STRIPES: No -$1.90/Yes +$1.75
ROVE IN PINK STRIPES: No -$1.80/Yes +$1.70
SIMPLE SCOTTY IN LAVENDER STRIPES: No -$1.75/Yes +$1.65
ANY ADMINSITRATION OFFICIAL IN STRIPES: Yes -$2.50/No +$2.25
PRESIDENT CHENEY OR THE FLYING MONKEY IN STRIPES: OUT-PRICE, OFF THE BOARD
THERE WILL BE ANOTHER PRISON-WORTHY SCANDAL RELATED TO "PVT CONTRACTORS": Yes -$3.00/No +$2.75
And we finish as usual with some sports stuff. Vargas knocked Castijello down in round 3 and looked to finish him off in round 4. Castillejo caught Vargas on the jaw in the 4th and the best Vargas could do was win a unanimous decision fighting with a broken jaw for 6 rounds. We love you El Feroz, and think of you every time we drive through Oxnard on the way to the 101 to Santa Barbara or San Francisco.
Now, tell Kelso honestly, isn't it better to leave the fighting to these guys?
All around wretched night on the Diamond as KC cracked it's 19-game losing streak, beating the A's 2-1 despite good performances from Zito and Duchscherer. Rudy Giluiani's Girls put a beat-down on the White Sox. And in a double shot to the solar plexus, The Los Angeles Angels of The Magic Kingdom of Anaheim beat the Sawx despite a nice effort by Bronson Arroyo. Kelso doesn't geddit. Why has Theo Epstein designated Arroyo for assignment; he's young, way undervalued and has been the Sawx most consistent starter? As Kelso has mad respect for Theo Epstein, Kelso can only guess that Theo's planning an awesome waiver-wire deadline blockbuster. For the interested student: deadline is August 31.
Kelso's Nuts love you very much.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
Kelso, I find it very hard to believe that anyone in the administration will end up wearing stripes. Particularly the Rover or Libby. I'd LOVE to see DeLay in stripes ... and I would say he's a likely prospect. But I wouldn't underestimate W's loyalty to this fine, upstanding public servant.
I also think the "private contractor" issue will be entirely swept under the carpet. This may not be a relevent point (and I'm not sure if you are referring to a. the non-competitive nature of the letting of contracts for the reconstruction efforts, b. the private contractors serving as mercenaries in the war, c. or some other particular issue), But Halliburton is a major conglomerate. I am not sure how many people are aware that Brown & Root is a subsidiary of Halliburton, or that Camp Dresser McKee is as well (I believe), in addition to numerous and sundry other large engineering and engineering / construction firms. When it comes to Halliburton, the potential for muddying the waters and confusing the average Joe is a real and present danger. I don't think the general public, as well, is aware of the extent to which private contractors are conducting this war and that they, in fact, are better armed and have been provided with body armor that our own soldiers soldiers have been denied.
I always return to my favorite Bob Dole quote, "where is the outrage?" Until the American public TRULY shows outrage (and nothwithstanding Cindy Sheehan's valiant and commendable efforts, the outrage, as far as I am concerned, is no where to be found, or it has just NOT reached the critical mass it did during periods such as Viet Nam and Watergate. Perhaps some of it is showing up in the polling, but other than that, there are too many people unwilling to take a stand, or, more ominously, have no stand at all. And the administration is aware of that I am sure. And they are aware that many, many people are not paying attention.
And regarding Abu Ghraib, who took ultimately the fall? The TRULY lower downs. And who were NOT held accountable? The Big Kids.
You stated:
"And if the big kids manage to duck it, there WILL be a few lower-downs forced by the Bush Crime Family to take it for the team."
I am convinced that this statement is not an "if" ... it's a "will."
So, restated:
The big kids WILL manage to duck it, there will be [more than] a few lower downs forced by the Bush Crime Family to take it [up the ass] for the team.
The Clintons did the same thing throughout their administration. How many of their staffers ended up with massive legal debts in the course of being loyal to Hil and Bill? Bubba paid a big price of course, BUT he didn't have a Crime Family behind him.
Plame is going to be in stripes. That is why its an organized crime investigation. She went bad. Too many lower downs took it for the team and that was her intention.
G: Now that's what Kelso calls a FUCKING COMMENT!!!!!
Nothing to argue with there. In terms of private contractors, Kelso was thinking along two lines (1) Thievery & Conspiracy to commit (2) War Crimes. Both bad, however, each fall under different jurisdictions, however.
Thanks also for your teasing apart the Halliburton structure. Funny fucking thing, when Kelso was in business school, he had a case on oil-well drilling collars or some such thing. In the case notes, there was a chart of the output, revenue and profits of the larger producers of these devices...bottom two on the list: Halliburton and Dresser. Guess torture and war-profiteering is a little better business than stuffy old oil-well drilling collars.
Spot on about Clintons, but you knew this is not a Democratic Party site. Mike Malloy says Bill Clinton was the best Repubican president we've ever had (Kelso ranks him 3rd behind Lincoln and TR), Hillary has a damned good shot at being one of the worst.
Thanks for setting a high standard.
Anonymous:
A VERY interesting take on the issue, which had slipped Kelso's "beautiful" mind entirely. That was a bad Barbara Bush joke, btw.
It just might work out that way, sadly enough, but Kelso finds himself a little uncomfortable nailing his colors to The Agency's mast. One never knows with these agency folks. Like your contrary thinking.
Please post again.
Kelso had a very different agenda in mind for today's posting, but he understands that war and polticis are what's on everyone's mind and not the evils of prison rape or the quixotic quests of Mr. Roderick Johnson, Adam Liptak, and Representative Lee.
He appreciates the high-quality of the comments nonetheless and corny as it sounds...it all y'alls' blog, too.
And that's why Kelso's Nuts love you.
Note to Floppers of the Nuts:
Kelso is not sure whether or not he'll go up the club to play cards tonight or not. Either way, he PROMISES to peruse the THE TISSUE OF LIES of Sunday and Monday for morsels for Monday's blog.
He will be up and ready because he has promised his racing partner to pay back insurance and vet bills on his racehorses (laziness, not stinginess) so no matter how late he stays up tonight playing cards, he will deliver a blog tomorrow.
Oh, about the racehorses, Kelso already knows he's a limousine-whatever.
AND KELSO MUST CORRECT AND EGREGIOUS ERROR. THE REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE WHO COINED THE TERMS "FREEDOM FRIES" AND "FREEDOM TOAST" (STILL IN EFFECT IN DC, APPARENTLY) WHEN CHIRAC WOULDN'T GO ALONG WITH THE BULLSHIT WAS MIS-IDENTIFIED IN A PREVIOUS KELSO'S NUTS.
THE MAN'S NAME IS WALTER JONES AND HE'S TO BE PRAISED AND THANKED FOR HIS COURAGE AND WILLINGNESS TO ADMIT HE WAS WRONG.
KELSO FEELS TERRIBLE ABOUT GETTING A GOOD GUY'S NAME WRONG. SORRY, WALTER.
Kelso, the G playing "devil's advocate" again:
I'm still not entirely sure I understand your point re prison rape. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying it's a good thing, far from it and I think it is something to be prosecuted within the prison system itself (wishful thinking of course). I guess I don't completely understand why you think it's SUDDENLY become an imperative (actually, I believe the article noted that it has "been on the books" since 2003) and how you deduce that its sudden imperative is being driven by the Administration in an effort to protect its own who are facing possible imprisonment.
When Charles Colson went to jail because of Watergate, it certainly did not suddenly become the issue du'jour. Of course, that was a very, very different time in our history. And, in fact, Colson was quite entrepreurial during his time in prison, setting up a prison ministry that continues to this day (no matter what you may think of the man or his belief system ... he used his time in prison to create a new life for himself outside of prison).
Plus, do you think the individuals you mention as being prison-bound are going to be sent to maximum security prisons where, I presume, the rape issue is most prevelant and the most vicious? I think that they would most likely be sent to minimum security, or even the "country club" type prisons where the likes of Michael Milken were sent. I'm not a lawyer, of course, but my sense that these could be treated as "white-collar" criminals (white guys in grey suits and red ties ... come on, how bad can they be?).
In addition, as you mentioned, these guys are members, or consigliere, of the Bush Crime family. My sense is that no matter where they are sent (if they are in fact sent and if they really are key and indispensible figures in The Organization) the long tentacles of The Organization will provide a certain amount of protection.
Also, The Times article was relatively short, far from comprehensive. That leads me to believe that it is NOT as a big an issue as you seem to make it out to be.
G: When government officials are being threatened with having their manhood took, it's news. Full stop. These Right-Wing crazies and their media whores don't even care when it's business folks facing that kind of fate.
Post a Comment